Current:Home > InvestTrump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case -GrowthSphere Strategies
Trump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case
View
Date:2025-04-16 12:34:25
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Donald Trump told a federal appeals court on Wednesday that it should not speed up its consideration of whether the former president is immune from prosecution, accusing federal prosecutors of trying to rush his 2020 election subversion case through before next year’s presidential election.
“The prosecution has one goal in this case: To unlawfully attempt to try, convict, and sentence President Trump before an election in which he is likely to defeat President Biden,” defense lawyers wrote Wednesday. “This represents a blatant attempt to interfere with the 2024 presidential election and to disenfranchise the tens of millions of voters who support President Trump’s candidacy.”
The issue is of paramount significance to both sides given the potential for a protracted appeal to delay a trial beyond its currently scheduled start date of March 4. Trump faces charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election after he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, and he has denied doing anything wrong.
Trump’s legal team had appealed a trial judge’s rejection of arguments that he was protected from prosecution for actions he took as president. But special counsel Jack Smith sought to short-circuit that process by asking the Supreme Court on Monday to take up the issue during its current term, a request he acknowledged was “extraordinary” but one he said he was essential to keep the case on track.
Smith’s team simultaneously asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to expedite its consideration of Trump’s appeal, writing: “The public has a strong interest in this case proceeding to trial in a timely manner. The trial cannot proceed, however, before resolution of the defendant’s interlocutory appeal.”
The Supreme Court has indicated that it would decide quickly whether to hear the case, ordering Trump’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 20. The court’s brief order did not signal what it ultimately would do.
A Supreme Court case usually lasts several months, from the time the justices agree to hear it until a final decision. Smith is asking the court to move with unusual, but not unprecedented, speed.
Nearly 50 years ago, the justices acted within two months of being asked to force President Richard Nixon to turn over Oval Office recordings in the Watergate scandal. The tapes were then used later in 1974 in the corruption prosecutions of Nixon’s former aides.
It took the high court just a few days to effectively decide the 2000 presidential election for Republican George W. Bush over Democrat Al Gore.
If the justices decline to step in at this point, Trump’s appeal would continue at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Smith said even a rapid appellate decision might not get to the Supreme Court in time for review and final word before the court’s traditional summer break.
veryGood! (11)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Trump says his criminal indictments boosted his appeal to Black voters
- GM suspends sales of Chevy Blazer EV due to quality issues
- MLB's jersey controversy isn't the first uproar over new uniforms: Check out NBA, NFL gaffes
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- The body of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny has been handed over to his mother, aide says
- Inherited your mom's 1960s home? How to use a 1031 exchange to build wealth, save on taxes
- Former Cowboys receiver Golden Richards, known for famous Super Bowl catch, dies at 73
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Despite a Big Budget Shortfall, Moore Commits $90 Million to Help Maryland Cut Emissions.
Ranking
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Ken Jennings on 'Jeopardy!' Tournament of Champions, 'misogynistic' Mayim Bialik critics
- GOP lawmakers try to thwart abortion rights ballot initiative in South Dakota
- A Brewer on the Brewers? MLB player hopes dream becomes reality with Milwaukee
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Woman killed during a celebration of Chiefs’ Super Bowl win to be remembered at funeral
- New Jersey man acquitted in retrial in 2014 beating death of college student from Tennessee
- Charles Barkley and Gayle King were right to call out Nikki Haley over racism claim
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Score Exclusive Deals During Tory Burch's Private Sale, With Chic Finds Under $100
Kayakers paddle in Death Valley after rains replenish lake in one of Earth’s driest spots
Trump enters South Carolina’s Republican primary looking to embarrass Haley in her home state
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
Jury finds Wayne LaPierre, NRA liable in corruption civil case
NFL has 'unprecedented' $30 million salary cap increase 2024 season
Two children die after hillside collapses near Shasta Dam in California, police say