Current:Home > StocksApple agrees to pay up to $500 million in settlement over slowed-down iPhones: What to know -GrowthSphere Strategies
Apple agrees to pay up to $500 million in settlement over slowed-down iPhones: What to know
View
Date:2025-04-13 03:01:28
Years after a lawsuit alleged Apple was adding software that slowed down older iPhones, the tech giant has agreed to pay a settlement worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarty, one of the firms representing Apple customers in the suit, announced Aug. 9 that the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals dismissed two appeals from people challenging the settlement. Apple has agreed to pay a minimum of $310 million and up to $500 million in compensation for approximately 100 million iPhone users, in what the firm is calling the "largest-all cash recovery in a computer intrusion case in history."
Between December 2017 and June 2018, there were 66 class action lawsuits filed against Apple alleging this issue, including that Apple deliberately slowed down battery performance of older iPhones with iOS updates, according to Bloomberg Law.
Why does my iPhone get hot?Here's how to beat the heat, keep you devices cool this summer
Who is eligible for Apple iPhone settlement?
In a 2017 letter to consumers, Apple apologized for slowing down older iPhones and offered a reduction in the price of replacement batteries. The company said in the letter that a software update from 2016 may have had some users "experience longer launch times for apps and other reductions in performance."
Payments will be distributed to people who filed claims before the October 2020 deadline and owned one of these phones:
- iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S Plus and/or SE device that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later before Dec. 21, 2017
- iPhone 7 or 7Plus that ran iOS 11.2 or later before Dec. 21, 2017
For more details about the settlement, visit this website.
Around 3 million people filed and were approved, Verge reported, and expected payments are around $65.
Tech:A first-generation iPhone sold for $190K at an auction this week. Here's why.
veryGood! (748)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Court orders China Evergrande property developer to liquidate after it failed to reach debt deal
- Pauly Shore sued by man for alleged battery and assault at The Comedy Store club
- 'Very clear' or 'narrow and confusing'? Abortion lawsuits highlight confusion over emergency exceptions
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Halle Bailey Fiercely Defends Decision to Keep Her Pregnancy Private
- Super Bowl-bound: Kansas City Chiefs' six-step plan to upsetting the Baltimore Ravens
- Jay Leno files for conservatorship over his wife's estate due to her dementia
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- How shoot lasers into the sky could help deflect lightning
Ranking
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- How Below Deck Has Changed Since Captain Lee Rosbach's Departure
- Takeaways from the AP’s investigation into how US prison labor supports many popular food brands
- Who is No Doubt? Gwen Stefani had to explain band to son ahead of Coachella reunion
- 'Most Whopper
- Eminem goes after Benzino in new Lyrical Lemonade track, rekindles longtime feud
- Last victim of Maui wildfires identified months after disaster
- Transitional housing complex opens in Atlanta, cities fight rise in homelessness
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Poland protests error in a social media post by EU chief suggesting Auschwitz death camp was Polish
Dakota Johnson's 'SNL' opening monologue crashed by Justin Timberlake and Jimmy Fallon
70 Facts About Oprah Winfrey That Are Almost as Iconic as the Mogul Herself
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
70 Facts About Oprah Winfrey That Are Almost as Iconic as the Mogul Herself
South China Sea tensions and Myanmar violence top agenda for Southeast Asian envoys meeting in Laos
'Very clear' or 'narrow and confusing'? Abortion lawsuits highlight confusion over emergency exceptions